Saturday, April 27, 2013

Woody Guthrie Center opens Saturday in Tulsa

TULSA, Okla. (AP) ? Supporters of folk singer Woody Guthrie say the opening of a center chronicling his storied life and career is long overdue in his native state of Oklahoma.

The 12,000-square-foot Woody Guthrie Center opens Saturday afternoon in Tulsa.

It features Oklahoma's only permanent exhibit on the Dust Bowl and also includes Guthrie's original handwritten copy of "This Land Is Your Land," perhaps his best-known song.

Guthrie's daughter Nora says Oklahomans should take pride in knowing that the core of who her father was as a man and a musician was determined in Oklahoma.

The center is also home to the Woody Guthrie Archives, a collection featuring nearly 3,000 song lyrics, hundreds of pieces of artwork, journal entries, postcards, manuscripts and more than 500 photographs, among other rare items.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/woody-guthrie-center-opens-saturday-tulsa-200053464.html

Ron Jeremy Rudy Gay Jim Nabors The Americans bank of america online banking Adairsville Ga ashley judd

Friday, April 26, 2013

Home News Society International War Business Environment Health ...

fans

?In an age where literally everything has to be arch, knowing, witty or retro, Iron Maiden fans somehow still don?t give a fuck.? Thank you, professor Henry Brubaker.


Here is a little piece from The Daily Mash. Have a nice weekend.

FANS of the band Iron Maiden are somehow unaffected by the self-consciousness epidemic sweeping the Western world.

As thousands of Maiden fans rushed to buy the band?s beer just because they like the band and they like beer, scientists marvelled at their integrity.

Professor Henry Brubaker of the Institute for Studies said: ?In an age where literally everything has to be arch, knowing, witty or retro, Iron Maiden fans somehow still don?t give a fuck.

?They just like their thing for what it is, their hairy backs aren?t a statement and when they wear double denim with a bumbag it?s in no way ironic.

?The rest of us will never achieve that level of enjoyment of anything, because our stupid aspirations have made us into dicks.?

46-year-old Maiden fan Roy Hobbs said: ?I go to work doing a job I can?t even be bothered to describe, then I come home and eat either a pie or a casserole with my wife, who is also into Maiden, then we drink a couple of beers and listen to The Number of the Beast.

?We?re very happy. Why wouldn?t we be??

The_Number_Of_The_Beast_cover

Raising the enjoyment level.

Hobbs confirmed that he had no opinion whatsoever about stick-on moustaches, retro gaming, boutique camping, dieting, vintage things, banter, street food, garlic presses or Jude Law.

Professor Brubaker said: ?Their houses may smell of feet and engine oil but they make everyone else in the country look like pretentious twats.?

Source: The Daily Mash

Like this:

Like Loading...

Source: http://maidenrevelations.com/2013/04/26/home-news-society-international-war-business-environment-health-science-technology-arts-entertainment-cele/

masters golf tournament the replacements how to hard boil eggs new nfl uniforms derbyshire the matrix oceans 11

Desiree Hartsock as The Bachelorette: First Photos!

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/04/desiree-hartsock-as-the-bachelorette-first-photos/

wmt human nature arkansas football blackhawks howard johnson levon helm firelight

Obama, former presidents rally around George W. Bush as library opens

By Steve Holland

DALLAS (Reuters) - George W. Bush basked in warm praise from President Barack Obama and three fellow former presidents on Thursday as Bush's library was dedicated in a ceremony that emphasized his resolute response to terrorism while skirting controversies such as his decision to invade Iraq.

Obama and fellow Democrats Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, along with Bush's father, former President George H.W. Bush, came together on the campus of Southern Methodist University to honor one of their own. At the end of the hour-long ceremony, Bush - who has largely avoided public life since leaving Washington in January 2009 - choked back tears as he concluded his remarks.

Obama captured the feeling of the day when he indicated that Bush's political friends and foes both view the former president as genuine.

"To know the man is to like the man, because he's comfortable in his own skin," Obama said. "He takes his job seriously but he doesn't take himself too seriously. He's a good man."

Bush, a Republican, had historically low popularity ratings for a U.S. president - about 33 percent - when he left office.

Although most Americans give him credit him for his steadfast response to the September 11, 2001, attacks, many opposed his decision to go war against Iraq on what turned out to be a false claim that Saddam Hussein's regime was stockpiling biological and chemical weapons. By the end of Bush's term a once-vibrant economy was collapsing, fueling an image of an administration gone awry.

But time away from the spotlight has helped Bush in the eyes of many Americans. In the days leading up to the dedication of his library and museum, a Washington Post-ABC News poll indicated that Bush's approval rating was 47 percent, about equal to Obama's.

In his speech, Bush alluded to the difficult choices he faced as president, which is a theme that runs through several of the library's exhibits.

"One of the things about democracies is people are free to disagree. It's fair to say I gave people plenty of opportunities to exercise that right," Bush said with a chuckle.

ELDER BUSH: 'GLAD TO BE HERE'

The former presidents form what amounts to the world's most exclusive gathering, known informally as the Presidents Club. Most were rivals at one time or another, but the shared experience of being president has created bonds between them.

The United States has 13 presidential libraries around the country which preserve documents and records from presidents dating to Herbert Hoover.

During the ceremony the former presidents focused on the positive aspects of Bush's tenure. Clinton and Carter praised Bush for pushing Congress to fund AIDS relief for Africa.

Clinton is particularly close to Bush's father, George H.W. Bush, because the two have worked on various relief projects together.

Clinton teased Bush about the not-so-complex paintings that Bush, a novice artist, had produced in recent years, including self-portraits of Bush in the shower and the bathtub.

Clinton, a Democrat, said he considered asking Bush to do a similar painting of him, but then thought better of it.

"Those bathroom sketches are great, but at my age I think I should keep my suit," he said to laughter.

George H.W. Bush, 88 and in a wheelchair, had a health scare last December. But on Thursday he joined the other former presidents and their wives onstage, and spoke briefly.

"We're glad to be here," he said in a shaky voice. "God bless America."

Unlike other former presidents, Carter, a Democrat who served from 1977 to 1981, has not been shy about criticizing his predecessors. But he was upbeat when he stood before the crowd of Bush supporters.

Carter recalled that Bush had become president after winning a disputed election in 2000 against Democrat Al Gore. Carter said that two months later, he was among the few Democrats to show up for Bush's first inauguration.

Carter thanked Bush for helping the needy in Africa with increased foreign assistance and for seeking a solution to the conflict in Sudan. Carter told Bush he was grateful "for the contributions you've made to the most needy people on Earth."

The crowd included a who's who of dignitaries who served with Bush, such as former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, forever linked with Bush on the decision to launch the Iraq war. Former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi also attended.

Since he left office, Bush, a 66-year-old Texan, has focused mostly on helping to build his library and museum, getting involved in charitable projects as well as painting, playing golf and riding mountain bikes.

The museum exhibits cover major points of Bush's presidency and offer visitors an opportunity to decide how they would have responded to those challenges. A central part is devoted to the September 11 attacks.

"When our freedom came under attack we made the tough decision required to keep our people safe," Bush said. He said his library's presidential center will be devoting to promoting freedom abroad.

"I'm retired from politics - happily so, I might add - but not from public service," he said.

Bush's supporters hope the library and the passage of time will lead more Americans to their belief that his performance in the White House was better than they might have thought.

(Editing by David Lindsey and Cynthia Osterman)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/george-w-bush-returns-spotlight-library-dedication-055506893.html

m.i.a. adrianne curry hoekstra best superbowl commercials 2012 best super bowl ads chrysler super bowl commercial madonna half time show

U.S. believes Syria used chemical weapons but says facts needed

By Phil Stewart and David Alexander

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. intelligence agencies believe Syria's government has likely used chemical weapons on a small scale, the White House said on Thursday, but added that President Barack Obama needed "credible and corroborated" facts before acting on that assessment.

The surprise disclosure triggered immediate calls for U.S. action by members of Congress who advocate deeper American involvement in Syria's bitter civil war.

The White House said the U.S. intelligence community assessed with varying degrees of confidence that the chemical agent sarin was used by forces allied with President Bashar al-Assad. But it noted that "the chain of custody is not clear."

While Obama has declared that Syrian use of chemical weapons would be a game-changer, his administration made clear it would move carefully - mindful of the lessons of the start of the Iraq war 10 years ago.

Then, the George W. Bush administration used faulty intelligence to justify invading Iraq in pursuit of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that turned out not to exist.

"Given the stakes involved and what we have learned from our own recent experiences, intelligence assessments alone are not sufficient - only credible and corroborated facts that provide us with some degree of certainty will guide our decision-making," Miguel Rodriguez, White House director of the office of legislative affairs, said in a letter to lawmakers.

One senior U.S. defense official told reporters that, "We have seen very bad movies before," where intelligence was perceived to have driven policy decisions that later, in the cold light of day, were proven wrong.

The term "varying degrees of confidence" used to describe the assessment usually suggests debate within the intelligence community about the conclusion, the defense official noted.

The White House said the evaluation that Syria probably used chemical weapons was based in part on physiological samples, but a White House official declined to say what kind of evidence it had, such as soil samples or blood or hair from victims.

The scale of the sarin use appeared limited, with one U.S. intelligence official noting that nobody was "seeing any mass casualties" from any Syrian chemical weapons use.

The United States has so far resisted being dragged militarily into Syria's conflict, providing only non-lethal aid to rebels trying to overthrow Assad, given concerns that weapons end up the hands of al Qaeda-linked opposition fighters.

But acknowledgement of the U.S. intelligence assessment appeared to move the United States closer to some sort of action, military or otherwise.

A White House official told reporters "all options are on the table in terms of our response" and said the United States would consult with allies.

SURPRISE ANNOUNCEMENT

The Obama administration's sudden disclosure caught many off-guard, coming just two days after Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and other U.S. officials appeared to play down an Israeli assessment of chemical weapons use.

France and Britain have also concluded evidence suggests chemical arms have been used in Syria's conflict.

"The intelligence community has been assessing information for some time on this issue and the decision to reach this conclusion was made within the past 24 hours," Hagel said.

The White House said it wanted to provide a "prompt response" to an April 24 query from lawmakers about whether Syria had used chemical weapons. The lawmakers' letter to Obama cited the assessments by Israel, France and Britain.

Greg Theilmann, a former weapons proliferation expert in the State Department's intelligence bureau, said, "I'm just a little surprised the U.S. rolls out an assessment in this way."

In the last 24 hours, "did hard evidence suddenly appear?" said Theilmann, now at the private Arms Control Association.

Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona, one of the leading advocates of deeper U.S. involvement in the Syrian conflict, said the U.S. intelligence assessment demanded a U.S. response.

"The president of the United States said that if Bashar Assad used chemical weapons, it would be a game changer, that it would cross a red line," he said.

"I think it's pretty obvious that red line has been crossed."

Senator Dianne Feinstein, head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, voiced concerns that the public U.S. acknowledgement of its intelligence assessment could embolden Assad, prompting him to calculate "he has nothing more to lose."

"Syria has the ability to kill tens of thousands with its chemical weapons. The world must come together to prevent this by unified action," she said.

Syria's deputy foreign minister, Faisal Mekdad, told Reuters that U.S. aid to the rebels may backfire and lead to attacks on American soil like those of September 11, 2001.

"Once the fire of terrorism spreads in Syria it will go everywhere in the world," he said in an interview in Damascus.

(Additional reporting by Matt Spetalnick, Roberta Rampton, Patricia Zengerle, Tabassum Zakaria; Writing by Phil Stewart; Editing by Alistair Bell and Bill Trott)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/u-believes-syria-used-chemical-weapons-says-facts-180547990.html

harrisburg top chef texas great pacific garbage patch ben affleck and jennifer garner google privacy changes windows 8 preview leap year

Drinking one 12-ounce sugar-sweetened soft drink a day can increase the risk of type 2 diabetes by 22 percent, study suggests

Apr. 24, 2013 ? Drinking one (or one extra)* 12oz serving size of sugar-sweetened soft drink a day can be enough to increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes by 22%, a new study suggests. The research is published in Diabetologia (the journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes) and comes from data in the InterAct consortium**.

The research is by Dr Dora Romaguera, Dr Petra Wark and Dr Teresa Norat, Imperial College London, UK, and colleagues.

Since most research in this area has been conducted in North American populations, the authors wanted to establish if a link between sweet beverage consumption and type 2 diabetes existed in Europe. They used data on consumption of juices and nectars, sugar-sweetened soft drinks and artificially sweetened soft drinks collected across eight European cohorts participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC study; UK, Germany, Denmark, Italy, Spain, Sweden, France, Italy, Netherlands)***, covering some 350,000 participants.

As part of the InterAct project, the researchers did a study which included 12,403 type 2 diabetes cases and a random sub-cohort of 16,154 identified within EPIC. The researchers found that, after adjusting for confounding factors, consumption of one 12oz (336ml) serving size of sugar-sweetened soft drink per day increased the risk of type 2 diabetes by 22%. This increased risk fell slightly to 18% when total energy intake and body-mass index (BMI) were accounted for**** (both factors that are thought to mediate the association between sugar-sweetened soft drink consumption and diabetes incidence). This could indicate that the effect of sugar-sweetened soft drink on diabetes goes beyond its effect on body weight.

The authors also observed a statistically significant increase in type 2 diabetes incidence related to artificially sweetened soft drink consumption, however this significant association disappeared after taking into account the BMI of participants; this probably indicates that the association was not causal but driven by the weight of participants (i.e. participants with a higher body weight tend to report higher consumption of artificially sweetened drinks, and are also more likely to develop diabetes). Pure fruit juice and nectar***** consumption was not significantly associated with diabetes incidence, however it was not possible using the data available to study separately the effect of 100% pure juices from those with added sugars.

The authors say the increased risk of diabetes among sugar-sweetened soft drink consumers in Europe is similar to that found in a meta-analysis of previous studies conducted mostly in North America (that found a 25% increased risk of type 2 diabetes associated with one 12 oz daily increment of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption).

Dr Romaguera concludes: "Given the increase in sweet beverage consumption in Europe, clear messages on the unhealthy effect of these drinks should be given to the population."

Notes

*The increased risk of 22% is for each extra 12oz sugar sweetened drink, so would apply to someone who had 1 drink versus someone who had 0, or someone who had 2 drinks versus someone who had 1, etc.

**The InterACT consortium is investigating, among other things, nutritional factors and physical activity to study the association of nutritional, dietary and physical activity behaviours with incident diabetes in the nested case-cohort study and to contribute to the analysis of gene-lifestyle interaction. It is a sub-division of the EPIC study, which was designed to investigate the relationships between diet, nutritional status, lifestyle and environmental factors and the incidence of cancer and other chronic diseases.

***The centres involved were France, Italy, Spain, Denmark, UK (Oxford, Cambridge), Netherlands (Bilthoven, Utrecht), Germany (Heidelberg, Potsdam), Sweden (Umea, Malmo)

****Extra info from Dr Romaguera: The 22% figure is used as the top line because it is widely accepted by the scientific community that these models should not be adjusted for BMI. In the meta-analysis comparison with other studies from the USA, the risk is those studies is NOT adjusted by BMI. That makes it possible to compare the two sets of results (25% increased risk in North American studies versus 22% in Europe).

*****nectars (UK and USA definition) are fruit juices that have been diluted to some extent and may contain additives (sugar or sweeteners)

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Diabetologia, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. The InterAct consortium. Consumption of sweet beverages and type 2 diabetes incidence in European adults: results from EPIC-InterAct. Diabetologia, 2013 (in press) DOI: 10.1007/s00125-013-2899-8

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/health_medicine/nutrition/~3/3I2YnuZPQ6w/130424185205.htm

steelers scarlett johansson tim tebow survivor snl peter frampton Sandy Hook Elementary School Colors

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Dogma among researchers exaggerates threat of resistance to best anti-malarial drugs, says malaria expert

Apr. 23, 2013 ? Exaggeration over the extent of the malaria parasite's resistance to the 'wonder drugs' artemisinins could jeopardise the fight against the disease, according to a leading expert.

In an opinion article published on World Malaria Day today (25 April 2013) -- online in the journal Trends in Parasitology, Professor Sanjeev Krishna of St George's, University of London argues that much of the evidence of the malaria parasite's resistance to artemisinin has been misinterpreted. He says this has led to the extent of artemisinin resistance being overstated, and that fears of its demise as an effective treatment are premature.

The artemisinin class of drugs are the best anti-malarial treatments available, and are used most effectively with other drugs as artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). Recent research has suggested that the malaria parasite is developing resistance to ACTs, particularly in Southeast Asia. Experts fear that if artemisinins became obsolete -- as previous anti-malarials have -- the effect could be devastating, as there are currently no other effective alternatives.

However, Professor Krishna argues that -- despite being accepted as dogma by the malaria research community -- most of the descriptions of artemisinin resistance do not meet the criteria by which resistance to other anti-malarials and drugs for other diseases have been measured.

For true resistance to exist, according to criteria used for other drugs, there needs to be: a significant failure in treatment (by not meeting the World Health Organization's target of a 95 per cent cure rate 28 days after treatment); a reduced sensitivity to the drug when the parasite is examined in the lab; and a visible delay in ridding the patient of parasites.

Currently, Professor Krishna says, it seems to be accepted that artemisinin treatment failure has occurred when a three-day course of ACT does not meet the target cure rate. This has been observed in a number of studies and has been used to try and understand 'artemisinin resistance.'

But other studies of seven-day courses of artemisinin monotherapies -- in which artemisinins are used alone, without partner drugs -- have shown up to 100 per cent cure rates after 28 days.

This, Professor Krishna, says, indicates proof of resistance to ACTs, but that there is no compelling evidence that artemisinins themselves are becoming less effective. He says this resistance will usually "be to a combination of an artemisinin with another drug against which there is usually a high background of resistance already."

"Contending that there is artemisinin resistance when cure of patients relies on the partner drug of an artemisinin is difficult to substantiate without additional studies," writes Professor Krishna. "It is more appropriate to describe the lack of observed efficacy as resistance to an artemisinin combination therapy rather than as being artemisinin resistance."

He adds that "crying wolf" and raising fears of artemisinin resistance when it is not yet proven "will itself have significant costs, so that when the wolf finally turns up, exhausted villagers no longer respond."

To ensure better understanding of when true artemisinin resistance occurs, and to learn how to fight it, Professor Krishna says there needs to be further research into the how the drugs work against the parasite. He also urges the development of molecular markers to predict the failure of the partner drugs used in ACTs, as well as further studies on artemisinin monotherapies.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of St George's London, via AlphaGalileo.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/~3/h0Kk4iRgEvc/130424222422.htm

1800 Flowers walking dead The Pope bruno mars the Grammys 2013 State of the Union 2013 katy perry